Overview
Request 1140015 revoked
Added file ruby-3.3.patch for ruby 3.3 support (boo#1218951).
- Created by 13ilya
- In state revoked
- Supersedes 1139832
-
Open review for
opensuse-review-team
- Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:I
It's working now.
I also don't understand why when I do SR I have to specify the target repository openSUSE:Factory, in other projects it is set automatically?
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Virtualization:vagrant/vagrant
This is not a branch/linked package with target opens use:Factory - so there is nothing for osc to guess where it should submit to.
To relink you can do, once this Sr is accepted:
osc branch openSUSE:Factory vagrant --nodevel Virtualization:vagrant -f
That should put the _link back and enable full branch
osc branch opens use:Factory vagrant --no-devel Virtualization:vagrant -f
usage: osc [global opts] <command> [--help] [opts] [args] osc: error: unrecognized arguments: --no-devel
I re-initialized the branch for you
it was --nodevel in this case (some other osc commands use --no-devel; this is confusing)
Request History
13ilya created request
Added file ruby-3.3.patch for ruby 3.3 support (boo#1218951).
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
staging-bot set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:I as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:I"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:I"
licensedigger accepted review
The legal review is accepted preliminary. The package may require actions later on.
darix declined request
mrueckert wrote (1140015),the requires with the "," is wrong imho,,also it might make sense to limit building vagrant just for the default ruby,,To do this you just add those 2 lines to your spec file,,```,%global rb_build_versions %{rb_default_ruby},%global rb_build_ruby_abis %{rb_default_ruby_abi},```,
13ilya revoked request
Explain why using a comma to specify the minimum and maximum versions in BuildRequires: is wrong?
@mrueckert a comma is not wrong, it's just the same as splitting it over multiple lines (like that reformatter does)