Overview
Request 1154109 superseded
- Created by rrahl0
- In state superseded
- Supersedes 1153763
- Superseded by 1156660
-
Open review for
opensuse-review-team
-
Open review for
factory-staging
Request History
rrahl0 created request
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger accepted review
ok
staging-bot added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27"
darix declined request
mrueckert wrote (1154109) (https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1154109),please version the provides for the old name. a provides without a version would satisfy any versioned requires
anag+factory reopened request
Reopened via staging workflow.
anag+factory added factory-staging as a reviewer
Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"
anag+factory accepted review
Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27"
anag+factory declined request
Declined via staging workflow.
superseded by 1156660
mrueckert wrote (1154109) (https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1154109) 1. you should version the provides too.
Provides without version would satisfy every versioned requires
normally I would expect something like
Provides: bottles = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: bottles <= %{version}-%{release}yes, the version did change, already a bit ago. they went from a year version to this now. so when I provide the old name, do I only need to provide the last version of the older name? on top of that, with Obsoletes, I only obsoleted the older version scheme, but there are some versions I provided with the newer scheme but older name.