Overview
Request 1208102 superseded
- Conflicts with texlive-digestif-bin and texlive-digestif
- Update to version 0.6:
* Don't rely on kpathsearch
* Organize completion code in sections
* Add file name completion
* Add help handler for packages
* Fix luacheck warnings
* Update LICENSE.md
* Produce more robust info hyperlinks
* Add setup instructions for Sublime Text
* Add support for the positionEncoding capability
* Update integration test dependencies
* Fix typo
* Remove relative directories from package path
* Improve natbib support
- Created by uncomfyhalomacro
- In state superseded
- Supersedes 1207511
- Superseded by 1208149
-
Open review for
opensuse-review-team
- Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:12
found conflict of lua53-digestif-0.6-1.1.noarch with texlive-digestif-bin-2024.20240311.svn65210-100.2.x86_64 /usr/bin/digestif found conflict of lua54-digestif-0.6-1.1.noarch with texlive-digestif-bin-2024.20240311.svn65210-100.2.x86_64 /usr/bin/digestif
Request History
uncomfyhalomacro created request
- Conflicts with texlive-digestif-bin and texlive-digestif
- Update to version 0.6:
* Don't rely on kpathsearch
* Organize completion code in sections
* Add file name completion
* Add help handler for packages
* Fix luacheck warnings
* Update LICENSE.md
* Produce more robust info hyperlinks
* Add setup instructions for Sublime Text
* Add support for the positionEncoding capability
* Update integration test dependencies
* Fix typo
* Remove relative directories from package path
* Improve natbib support
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
anag+factory added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:12 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:12"
anag+factory accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:12"
licensedigger accepted review
The legal review is accepted preliminary. The package may require actions later on.
uncomfyhalomacro superseded request
superseded by 1208149
this seems counter productive ... is the other digestif binary doing kinda the same so they are kinda replacements for each other or can there be valid use cases that you want to have installed both? maybe we should rename one of the binaries?
tbh i have a feeling that we can finally remove this package? it seems to be it's now part of texlive group of packages now?
i will probably go with renaming the binary for now. i will re-SR later after thinking how to rename this.
From
tar Oxf packages/digestif.tar.xz tlpkg/tlpobj/digestif.tlpobjI see that we are talking about the same stuffmeans with the next TeXLive version update it is likely that the next digestif is the version 0.6 or even higher ... no idea if kpathsearch dependency is then part of.