Overview
Any special reason to not follow upstreams naming here? they call their package shine - so should we
shine-devel (providing pkgonfig(shine) and /usr/include/shine) - and libshine3 sounds absolutely fine. Together with a src package called shine
If it gets renamed, please Obsolete libshine-devel in case it is installed somewhere. mpc and vlc already use pkgconfig(shine), no need to adjust pkgs. Thanks.
Request History
namtrac created request
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
maxlin_factory added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:72"
maxlin_factory accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:72
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:72/standard
licensedigger accepted review
ok
dimstar accepted review
dimstar_suse accepted review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
