Overview
The entire conversation from https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/492010 still holds true - is sodium needed for the mini package? I'd prefer not!
Causes new cycle between libunbound-devel-mini and libsodium
Request History
stroeder created request
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
staging-bot set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo server:dns/openSUSE_Tumbleweed
factory-repo-checker reopened review
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo server:dns/openSUSE_Tumbleweed
factory-repo-checker reopened review
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo server:dns/openSUSE_Tumbleweed
factory-repo-checker added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please retest
dimstar_suse accepted review
Removing from openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H, re-evaluation needed
dimstar_suse added factory-staging as a reviewer
Requesting new staging review
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo server:dns/openSUSE_Tumbleweed
dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:M as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:M"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:M
licensedigger accepted review
ok
dimstar_suse accepted review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
Yes, still a build cycle. Not sure whether this should be solved elsewhere though.
imho, the correct thing would still be for the mini to remain mini and not pull in the sodium dep
Waiting for a solution on the cycle between sodium and unbound-mini
Hmm, libsodium only has "BuildRequires: pkgconfig" (which is AFAICS python-pkgconfig). I fail to see where the build cycle is.
Unignored: returned to active backlog.