Overview
Request History
msmeissn created request
- add upstream signing key and verify source signature (forwarded request 645336 from AndreasStieger)
licensedigger accepted review
ok
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
namtrac accepted review
dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B
dimstar accepted review
Removing from openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B, re-evaluation needed
dimstar added factory-staging as a reviewer
Requesting new staging review
dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A
dimstar_suse changed priority to moderate => important
raising priority for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A
repo-checker accepted review
cycle and install check passed
dimstar_suse accepted review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
new cycle i ring1
do we want that cycle?
if you dont we might split out the krb5 dep into a seperate package?
Would that mean a sep source package? If that were possible, that would be awesome
This would especially be helpful as keyutils is in fact a ring0 package - krb5 is 'only' a ring1 package; having that dep in ring0 can have quite some nasty side effects of further build deps pulling in, like the full openssl stack - not something I am looking forward to have in ring0 as a 'basic OS bootstrap cycle'
oh - but I just see we would have krb5-mini without openssl in ring0 - so if not easily doable, we can likely go on with the cycle extension