Overview

Request 883901 accepted

- update to 2.0.14 (SLE-17217):
- sysmacros.patch: Include for major/minor (bsc#1181571) (bsc#1183796)

Thomas Renninger's avatar
Thomas Renninger (trenn) -
source maintainer

Thanks Dirk, this change is appreciated!

Thomas Renninger's avatar
Thomas Renninger (trenn) -
source maintainer

Just for info... If you want to please release managers this command might come handy. Afaik there is a osc param now for this, otherwise you have to adjust REST API URL options manually: isc api -X POST "https://api.suse.de/source/openSUSE.org:systemsmanagement/cobbler?cmd=diff&expand=1&oproject=Devel%3AGalaxy%3AManager%3AHead&opackage=cobbler&unified=0&filelimit=0&tarlimit=0&onlyissues=1&view=xml"

This will tell you the feature/bug/CVE differences between cobbler develproject compared to Galaxy cobbler package...

Thomas Renninger's avatar
Thomas Renninger (trenn) -
source maintainer

iosc api -X POST "https://api.suse.de/source/openSUSE.org:Base:System/numactl?cmd=diff&expand=1&oproject=SUSE%3ASLE-15-SP3%3AUpdate&opackage=numactl&unified=0&filelimit=0&tarlimit=0&onlyissues=1&view=xml"

This would be the command for numactl comparing to SLE 15 SP3 vs this develproject changes file and only new features got added or bugs fixed in develproject...

<issue state="changed" tracker="bnc" name="1183796" label="[bsc#1183796](https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1183796)" url="https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183796"/>
<issue state="added" tracker="bnc" name="1133098" label="[bsc#1133098](https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133098)" url="https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133098"/>
<issue state="added" tracker="bnc" name="1181571" label="[bsc#1181571](https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1181571)" url="https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181571"/>
<issue state="added" tracker="bnc" name="955334" label="[bsc#955334](https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=955334)" url="https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955334"/>
<issue state="added" tracker="bnc" name="976199" label="[bsc#976199](https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=976199)" url="https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976199"/>
<issue state="added" tracker="fate" name="319973" label="[fate#319973](https://features.opensuse.org/319973)" url="https://fate.suse.com/319973"/>
<issue state="added" tracker="jsc" name="[SLE-17217](https://jira.suse.com/browse/SLE-17217)" label="jsc#[SLE-17217](https://jira.suse.com/browse/SLE-17217)" url="https://jira.suse.com/browse/[SLE-17217](https://jira.suse.com/browse/SLE-17217)"/>
Andreas Jaeger's avatar
Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) -
source maintainer

Where is this change "include bugfixes in SLE, to enable 32 bit systems (SLE-17217) "? I expected a patch but see only a spec file change...

Dirk Mueller's avatar
Dirk Mueller (dirkmueller) -
author source maintainer

it is aligning the changes file with Factory from SLE, see "SLE Factory First Policy".

Request History
Dirk Mueller's avatar

dirkmueller created request

- update to 2.0.14 (SLE-17217):
- sysmacros.patch: Include for major/minor (bsc#1181571) (bsc#1183796)

Factory Auto's avatar

factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer

Please review sources

Factory Auto's avatar

factory-auto accepted review

Check script succeeded

Saul Goodman's avatar

licensedigger accepted review

ok

Richard Brown's avatar

RBrownSUSE set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H as a staging project

Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H"

Richard Brown's avatar

RBrownSUSE accepted review

Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H"

Ismail Dönmez's avatar

namtrac accepted review

Richard Brown's avatar

RBrownSUSE accepted review

Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H got accepted.

Richard Brown's avatar

RBrownSUSE approved review

Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H got accepted.

Richard Brown's avatar

RBrownSUSE accepted request

Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H got accepted.

openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by
Places